Trump violated US constitution by blocking critics on Twitter, federal court rules

First amendment calls for more speech, rather than less, on matters of public concern, federal appeals court says

President Donald Trump cant ban critics from his Twitter account, a federal appeals court ruled on Tuesday, saying the first amendment calls for more speech, rather than less, on matters of public concern.

The second US circuit court of appeals in Manhattan upheld a lower court judge who said Trump violates the constitution when he blocks critics.

The irony in all of this is that we write at a time in the history of this nation when the conduct of our government and its officials is subject to wide-open, robust debate, circuit judge Barrington D Parker wrote on behalf of a three-judge panel.


Recommended For You

Nano Express Commercial - 250GB

Create, manage and automate TV channels on Apple TV, Roku, and Amazon Fire TV, for yourself and for your customers. Publish massive amounts of content with just a click of a button.

ViralSiteXpress Premium

ViralSiteXpress Premium

Animaytor PREMIUM Commercial | LIVE Action Video Creator

Animaytor Premium Commercial | UNLIMITED Live Action Videos, 30 Studio Quality DONE-FOR-YOU Niche Templates Fully Editable and Brandable, 2000 videos with commercial rights, Audio and Voice Recorder, Kinetic Text and Transition Animation, 30 In-Video Social


The debate generates a level of passion and intensity the likes of which have rarely been seen, the courts decision read.

This debate, as uncomfortable and as unpleasant as it frequently may be, is nonetheless a good thing, the second circuit added. In resolving this appeal, we remind the litigants and the public that if the first amendment means anything, it means that the best response to disfavored speech on matters of public concern is more speech, not less.

The justice department did not immediately comment.

The ruling came in a case brought by the Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University. It had sued on behalf of seven individuals blocked by Trump after criticizing his policies.

Jameel Jaffer, the institutes director, said in an email that public officials social media accounts are now among the most significant forums for discussion of government policy.

The ruling will ensure that people arent excluded from these forums simply because of their viewpoints, he said.

Trump has more than 60 million followers of his @realDonaldTrump Twitter account.


Recommended For You

Videtar - Social Syndication

Videtar Social Syndication

VidViral Monthly

VidViral is a cloud based suite that turns any Video(YouTube, Vimeo, Dailymotion, or self upload) into a Attention Grabbing Masterpiece by adding a additional layer of header and footer to the video which directly talks with the viewer.


During oral arguments earlier this year, attorney Jennifer Utrecht argued for the president, saying that the account was created long before Trump became president and that he was acting in a private capacity when he blocks individuals.

Parker was critical during those arguments, foreshadowing Tuesdays decision.

Are you seriously urging us to believe that the president is not acting in his official capacity when he is tweeting? Parker said, noting that Trump subtracts from robust public discussion by blocking critics. Why isnt that just a quintessential first amendment violation?

The appeals court ruled that the first amendment does not permit a public official using a social media account for all manner of official purposes to exclude people from an otherwise open online dialogue because they disagree with the official.

Tuesdays ruling upheld a decision last year by US district judge Naomi Reice Buchwald.

Original Article : HERE ;

This post was curated & Posted using : RealSpecific

Thank you for taking the time to read our article.

If you enjoyed our content, we'd really appreciate some "love" with a share or two.

And ... Don't forget to have fun!

Leave a Reply