Islamophobia is not confined to online groups. It leaks across public life | Nosheen Iqbal

This ugly form of racism shapes the way Muslims are perceived and treated

On Friday morning, as the news from Christchurch was still rolling across radio bulletins, Sir Mark Rowley, the former head of counter-terrorism at the Met, was commenting on the horror on BBC Radio 4s Today programme. Fifty Muslims had been brutally murdered, and 48 seriously injured. For 17 horrifying minutes, a white supremacist terrorist unloaded round after round of bullets into men, women and children.

Islamophobia was undoubtedly real and on the rise and being propagated online, said Rowley. But, he went on to quibble, Islamophobia wasnt racism. To conflate the two was, he claimed, clumsy thinking.

The remark was treated as a random aside, made off the cuff, and left entirely unchallenged. Why? Because, it would seem, even on a morning when were reeling, devastated and trying to process terrorist violence in mosques, it is fair game to diminish the lived reality of Muslims. Which isnt me being dramatic; it is simply a fact.

Recommended For You

Conversly Lite


LeadPrimo Pro

World’s ONLY All-In-One Email Marketing Platform That Creates Beautiful Lead Pages and Send UNLIMITED Emails Directly into Inbox to Get You More Clicks and Open Rates Without Paying Any Monthly Fees FOREVER.

IM Checklist Volume 1: Product Creation

IM Checklist Volume 1 18 Product Creation Checklists

AdsCrisp Professional Ninja Commercial

10X Professional Tools for 20X FASTER Results using AdsCrisp.

Viral Commission Machine - Reseller Edition

Viral Commission Machine - Reseller Edition

Islamophobia is racism: its not a coincidence that the majority of Muslims are not white and have roots in formerly colonised countries. Its not an exaggeration to say that racist stereotypes abound to the point where you dont even have to be a Muslim to be attacked as one (just ask a Sikh navigating the world post-9/11).

Islamophobia does not simply exist on the unpalatable mass of the internet. Its not the preserve of rightwing extremists whom we write off as online nutters. It leaks across public life, in our institutions and our media, to form a pernicious feedback loop and almost nobody cares. If in doubt, consider the lonely figure cut by Sayeeda Warsi, whose calls for an inquiry into the documented Islamophobia within the Conservative party are blithely ignored by government.

Remember a referendum campaign won on lies, fear-mongering about mass immigration from refugees, from Turkey, from anyone with a funny tinge. Bear in mind the dogged work of Miqdaad Versi, of the Muslim Council of Britain, politely lodging complaints against thousands of Islamophobic stories in the press, often upheld by the Independent Press Standards Organisation, and barely anyone batting an eyelid. Given the hysterical state of national debate, it is either disingenuous or profoundly stupid to claim that the daily drip-feed of Islamophobia, which is now so normalised in Britain as to be hardly remarkable, doesnt significantly shape the way Muslims are perceived and treated.

Words matter. So do images. Its not for nothing that the atrocity in Christchurch was preceded by a 74-page manifesto published online and then streamed on Facebook Live. If a white supremacist can understand this power, its not beyond the editor who chose to publish a picture of him as a toddler on its front page, rather than using that space to humanise his victims.

It certainly cant escape the commentators who have made their bread and butter demonising and dehumanising Muslims and are expressing shock and grief at how their bile manifests in the real world.

Both the Daily Mail and the Mirror chose to gorge on the terrorists brutality, and broadcast his footage to their audience until they were shamed into removing it. This callous lack of humanity simply would never occur were the victims not Muslim and their lives already so othered, so seemingly disposable and without value.How did this angelic little boy grow up to be a mass killer, asks the Mirror. What did his grandmother think of her good boy grandson, probes the Daily Mail. Frankly, I dont care. I dont want to glorify his name. Im not yet ready for Newsnight choosing to choose to give a platform to a white fascist to discuss the massacre, under the hollow pursuit of free speech.

Its an exhausted cliche to point out the hypocritical differences in the way the Christchurch terrorist is being covered by our press and what we learned about, say, the killers of the British soldier Lee Rigby. Or the 7/7 bombers.

While it is, of course, a legitimate journalistic endeavour to understand how and why the gunman did what he did, humanising a mass murderer desperate for notoriety should not be the main focus of our attention. If he werent an angry white man, it wouldnt be. Its not too much to ask that care and empathy be focused on the victims. Their families. Their lives.

Original Article : HERE ; This post was curated & posted using : RealSpecific

Thank you for taking the time to read our article.

If you enjoyed our content, we'd really appreciate some "love" with a share or two.

And ... Don't forget to have fun!


AdConnect Funnel Ad Mastery

AdConnect Funnel Ad mastery. 4 part training series that helps you sell more without doing more work

KickassTuber Club Quarterly

The World's First "All-In-One" YouTube Graphics And Video Branding Platform - Pro Club Quarterly Membership

Leave a Reply